Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 03.07.2025 01:52

Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Kennedy’s HHS sent Congress ‘junk science’ to defend vaccine changes, experts say - CNN
Just in the last 5 years:
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Who’ll be the odd man out in the Cleveland quarterback battle? - NBC Sports
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sed autem voluptatibus minima impedit officia ipsa.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Blumhouse Reveals Trailer And Poster For ‘Black Phone 2’ - Deadline
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
How is it safe to put tape on your mouth at night?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Does Taylor Swift actually play the guitar, or is it a prop?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Thank you.
What’s next?
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.